Skip to content

b10cks kontra reszta

Szczere porównania. Bez marketingowej ściemy.

Zebrałem porównania obok siebie z systemami CMS, które zespoły najczęściej rozważają razem z b10cks. Doceniam to, co konkurencja robi dobrze. Mówię wprost o kompromisach. Możesz przeczytać drobny druk.

Five comparisons. Read the fine print, then decide.

The one-sentence version

It almost always comes down to the bill.

Other platforms charge more, gate features behind tiers, or bill per seat. b10cks charges for storage and traffic, and every feature is there from day one.

That is not a claim to take on trust. Read the comparisons and check it.

How these are written

Every number in these comparisons comes from the competitor's own published pricing. If one of them changes and we have not caught up, tell us.

Public pricing pages, current as of writing.

What we consistently find

The same five things, every single time.

Write five of these comparisons and the pattern stops being a coincidence. The features teams use daily are the ones the industry puts behind a tier.

01 / Localization

Gated almost everywhere.

Multi-language support, even a plain two-locale setup, is a paid or enterprise feature on most platforms. It is on every b10cks plan.

02 / Visual editing

Extra, or absent.

Most headless CMSs are form editors disconnected from the live page. b10cks ships two-way-bound visual editing on every plan.

03 / Version history

Sold as a premium.

Rolling back a content change is treated as an upgrade by Contentful and Storyblok. We treat it as infrastructure.

04 / Seats

Priced per person.

At $15 to $25 an editor, the CMS budget grows with your headcount instead of your usage. b10cks has no per-seat pricing.

05 / Audit logs

Enterprise tier only.

Immutable audit trails sit behind the top tier at every major competitor. They are included in every b10cks plan.

A note on fairness

Where they are better, we say so.

A comparison page written by one of the competitors is worth exactly as much as its worst sentence.

Sanity is more flexible if you want to build your own editor. TYPO3 handles a kind of institutional complexity we do not chase. WordPress has an ecosystem nobody will match this decade. Those sentences stay in, because a comparison that only flatters us is not information, it is an ad.

Where the choice comes down to a real trade-off rather than a price tag, the comparison spells out the trade-off and leaves the decision with you.

If you think a comparison is wrong, unfair, or out of date, tell us. Accuracy is the only thing that makes this page worth reading.

Michael WallnerBuilding b10cks at Coder's Cantina

Before you read the comparisons.

Compare, then decide

Read the fine print. Then try it yourself.

Every b10cks plan, the free one included, ships the features most competitors reserve for their top tier. The fastest comparison is the one you run in your own workspace.