b10cks vs. Sanity
Sanity is the most developer-flexible headless CMS on the market — and that's both the appeal and the limitation. You assemble the editing experience in React, write GROQ queries, and pay per seat. b10cks ships a complete platform for developers and editors alike, without the assembly required.
The Short Version
Sanity's architecture is genuinely impressive. Content Lake is a fast, flexible document store. GROQ is an expressive query language. Sanity Studio – built in React – is infinitely customizable. For developer-led teams building bespoke content experiences, this flexibility is the point.
The trade-off: Sanity Studio requires code to configure. Non-technical editors don't configure a Sanity deployment – developers do, and then hand it off. The editing environment is only as good as the developer who built it. There's no visual editor built in. There's no infinite canvas for content modeling. Localization is an implementation detail, not a platform feature.
And then there's the seat pricing: $15/user/month on the Growth plan. For a team of 10 editors, that's $150/month in user costs alone – before traffic or storage.
b10cks is built for the same developer who would choose Sanity, but also for the content team that developer works with. One platform. Complete out of the box.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | b10cks | Sanity Free | Sanity Growth | Sanity Enterprise |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Visual Editor (live preview) | ✅ All plans | ❌ (build it) | ❌ (build it) | ❌ (build it) |
| Content Modeling UI | ✅ Infinite Canvas | Code / Studio | Code / Studio | Code / Studio |
| Localization | ✅ All plans | ❌ (DIY) | ❌ (DIY) | ✅ add-on |
| Version History | ✅ All plans | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Scheduled Publishing | ✅ All plans | ❌ | 💰 Scheduled drafts | ✅ |
| REST API | ✅ All plans | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Multiplayer Collaboration | ✅ All plans | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Threaded Comments | ✅ All plans | ❌ | 💰 Growth add-on | ✅ |
| Built-in CDN | ✅ All plans | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Built-in Image Processing | ✅ All plans | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| AI Credits | ✅ All plans | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Open Source | ✅ AGPLv3 | Partial (Studio only) | Partial (Studio only) | Partial (Studio only) |
| Self-hosting | ✅ Always | ❌ (Content Lake is cloud-only) | ❌ | ❌ |
| Custom Roles | ✅ All plans | ❌ (2 roles) | ❌ (5 roles) | ✅ |
| Per-seat fees | ❌ Never | ❌ (20 seats free) | $15/seat/mo | Custom |
| Document limit | Unlimited | 10,000 | 25,000 | Custom |
| Uptime SLA | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ |
This is the most important thing to understand about Sanity: Sanity Studio is a configuration framework, not an out-of-the-box editing environment.
You define your schemas in JavaScript/TypeScript. Sanity Studio renders a form based on those schemas. The result is a functional admin interface – but it's form-based, not visual. There's no live preview of your content in your actual frontend built into the platform.
Preview in Sanity is something you build yourself – using Sanity's preview API hooks, you wire up a preview pane or a separate preview URL. This is a developer task, not a platform feature.
b10cks ships a two-way-bound visual editor where editors click on elements in the live preview and the editing panel jumps to those fields – in real time, without a page reload. This is platform-level, not implementation-level. Zero developer setup for the editorial experience.
Sanity uses GROQ (Graph-Relational Object Queries) – a powerful, expressive query language designed specifically for Sanity's document model. If you learn it, it's genuinely good.
The trade-off: GROQ is proprietary to Sanity. Your SDK choices, your frontend integrations, and your developer onboarding are all conditioned on familiarity with a language that exists nowhere else. That's a real form of vendor lock-in that's easy to overlook when GROQ feels like just another query language.
b10cks offers REST – standard, transferable, framework-agnostic. Any developer you hire already knows how to consume these APIs.
Sanity Studio – the frontend editing environment – is open source and can be deployed anywhere. But Sanity's Content Lake – the backend, the database, the actual content storage – is Sanity's proprietary managed cloud. It cannot be self-hosted.
This means that no matter how you customize Sanity Studio, your content always lives on Sanity's infrastructure. You can't run Sanity on-premise, in your own AWS account, or under your own data governance.
b10cks is fully self-hostable. The backend, the database, the storage – all of it runs wherever you decide. Self-hosting requires a single Docker Compose command and your own infrastructure.
Sanity doesn't have a localization system. You implement localization yourself – typically using a community plugin (sanity-plugin-internationalized-array or similar) that stores locale variants as object fields on documents. The approach works, but it's not standardized, not maintained by Sanity, and not integrated into the editing workflow.
For production multilingual products, this means developers spend time on infrastructure that b10cks ships by default: field-level translation control, locale inheritance, per-locale publish controls, locale switching in the editor.
Sanity's free plan is generous: 20 seats at no cost. But the Growth plan is $15/seat/month with no upper bound on seat count. For a 20-editor team, Growth costs $300/month in seat fees. For 30 editors, $450/month.
And Growth is still limited: 25,000 documents, 5 permission roles.
b10cks has no per-seat fees. Invite your entire company – developers, content managers, stakeholders, clients – without the meter running. You pay for storage and traffic. That's all.
Pricing Comparison
| Plan | Base Price | Per-Seat Cost | Documents | Roles | SSO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | – | 10,000 | 2 | ❌ |
| Growth | $0 base | $15/seat/mo | 25,000 | 5 | +$1,399/mo |
| Enterprise | Custom | Custom | Custom | Custom | ✅ |
Real scenarios:
Add-ons available on Growth: Dedicated Support ($799/mo), Increased quotas ($299/mo), Extra datasets ($999/dataset/mo).
| Plan | Price | Storage | Traffic | AI Credits |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free | €0 | 1 GB | 10 GB | $1 |
| Essential | €25/mo | 10 GB | 150 GB | $5 |
| Growth | €75/mo | 50 GB | 500 GB | $15 |
| Pro | €175/mo | 120 GB | 1.024 GB | $30 |
| Scale | €350/mo | 250 GB | 2.048 TB | $60 |
Every plan: unlimited editors, SSO, custom roles, visual editor, localization, version history, CDN, image processing, real-time collaboration, scheduled publishing. No add-ons.
The comparison: 10 editors, localization needed, SSO required, visual editing expected.
Sanity is the best option on the market for a specific type of project: one where a highly technical team wants maximum flexibility to build a completely custom editorial experience from the ground up, and where the team is comfortable with GROQ, JavaScript-defined schemas, and a managed-cloud-only backend.
It's the right choice if:
All the developer power. All the editorial experience. None of the assembly.